Aboriginals Indigenous People In Australia â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Aboriginals Indigenous People In Australia? Answer: Introducation The report focuses on the social policy in Australia and the implications of the same. The policy that has been dealt in the report is the assimilation policy. It further deals with the issues and problems it deals with and a detail of the term of it has been discussed. The purpose of the report is to deal the implications of the policy. The aim of the policy is to describe the history, features, and development of the policy. A suggestion has been drawn in the conclusion about how the policies could have been implemented in a better way to remove the issue. The Social Policy One of the most striking social policies is the assimilation policy. The centre for independent research has made a detailed study of this policy. This policy majorly focused on the absorption of the aboriginal people of Australia. The intention of the policy was to destroy the aboriginal society (Hollinsworth, 2013). The Aboriginal Protection Board adopted the policy in the year 1951. After the formation of the board, it officially made efforts to increase the pre-established practice of eliminating the children with comparatively fair skin who were then thought to be the partial aboriginal from the families itself. They were sent to the training institutes where they could be trained in taking part in the white society. In Australia, many were afraid of the new culture that was coming in Australia. There was a fear that the new entry would destroy the existing culture of Australia. The aboriginals were initially promised to stay in the land forever but later they were removed from their own land. Therefore, the major aspect of the policy was the lack of right to citizenship. The aboriginal people were denied the right to citizenship. The policy emerged to protect their right. The policy was forms on the assumption that the aboriginal population would be diminished but it did not work. The population went on increasing and at present many people of aboriginal decent has been from their own land and some have been even left homeless in the past (Cis.org.au/commentary/articles/indigenous-housing-deja-vu, 2017). The Emergence Of The Policy The policy was originated in the late nineteenth century. Initially it was assumed that the indigenous population in Australia would extinct. Later the population of these category of people started to increase and as a result it was understood that the aboriginals would not disappear from the society. The Australian government found the solution to this problem. It thought to discontinue the policy of protection to them, which made a separation of the indigenous people from the white ones (Beresford, Partington Gower, 2012). The indigenous people were placed on reserves and missions. The assimilation policies proposed that the original indigenous people should be allowed to die out through the process of natural elimination and on the other hand, the half- castes were inspired to mix up with the white community. The indigenous people were not allowed to use all the services that were made available only to the people with white skin. It is because of this reason that the policy cam e into effect (Van Krieken, 2012). Implementations Of The Policy The primary focus of the policy was on the children who were thought to more adaptable to the white society compared to the adults. The most remarkable application of the policy was the removal of the indigenous children in a forceful manner from the families of the children. Under this policy many generations of aboriginal children were removed from their families. They have become lost and extinct generation (Neumann, Gifford Scherr, 2014). Assimilation policy failed to improve the life of the aboriginal people in Australia, which was one of their major aims. The implication of this policy was not at all successful in Australia. It was rather a devastating one. The implementation of the policy was severe on this particular category of people and they are still suffering today. The indigenous community still today is getting affected because of the poor implication of the policy (Lingard, Creagh Vass, 2012) Analysis Of The Policy The policy was formed to preserve the rights of the aboriginals but they failed to do the same. The policy was framed with the aim of cultural assimilation. It separated the children from their native land and from their families, rather from their families. The cultural assimilation and biological absorption was a part of the assimilation policy. The biological absorption concentrated on the integration of the Aborigines with the white society by completely excluding the full-blooded individuals hoping that they would someday die out by inspiring the mixed race person to get married with the low class white people, which will result in reducing the aboriginality of the offspring. On the other hand, there is cultural assimilation, which aimed at culturally integrating the aboriginals with the white ones. It was more relevant during the Second World War (Collins, 2013). It was only after the Second World War that the realization was there that the absorption policy was not a successfu l one. The children with mixed race were still being born and the government could not ignore the indigenous population. There was no permanent solution of the problem. The population of indigenous people was not decreasing; rather it was increasing day by day. The implementation of the policy was not effective (Johnston, 2012). Conclusion The practice of the policy still mad no difference in Australia. The indigenous people are still the sufferers. It is difficult to acknowledge the effect of the policy. The Second World War played a major role in creating the issue of the assimilation policy. The implementation of the policy made the aboriginal people suffer a lot. They were literally abused and they suffered the most. Certain laws must be implemented which will serve the protection of the rights of the aboriginals in Australia. It must be checked that they are not uprooted from their land. Their current conditions must be evaluated. They must be provided with a more secure policy and secure status. References Beresford, Q., Partington, G., Gower, G. (2012). Reform and resistance in Aboriginal education.Reform and Resistance in Aboriginal Education, 498. Cis.org.au/commentary/articles/indigenous-housing-deja-vu/ (2017).Indigenous housing deja vu. [online] Cis.org.au. Available at: https://www.cis.org.au/commentary/articles/indigenous-housing-deja-vu/ [Accessed 21 Sep. 2017]. Collins, J. (2013). Multiculturalism and immigrant integration in Australia.Canadian Ethnic Studies,45(3), 133-149. Hollinsworth, D. (2013). Decolonizing indigenous disability in Australia.Disability Society,28(5), 601-615. Johnston, R. (2012).The Assimilation Myth: A study of second generation Polish immigrants in Western Australia(Vol. 14). Springer Science Business Media. Lingard, B., Creagh, S., Vass, G. (2012). Education policy as numbers: Data categories and two Australian cases of misrecognition.Journal of Education Policy,27(3), 315-333. Neumann, K., Gifford, S. M., Lems, A., Scherr, S. (2014). Refugee settlement in Australia: policy, scholarship and the production of knowledge, 1952 2013.Journal of Intercultural Studies,35(1), 1-17. Van Krieken, R. (2012). Between assimilation and multiculturalism: models of integration in Australia.Patterns of Prejudice,46(5), 500-517.